<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>University City - EdTribune MO - Missouri Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for University City. Data-driven education journalism for Missouri. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Six St. Louis-Area Districts Improved. Eight Still Exceed 39% Chronic Absence</title><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-07-21-mo-north-stl-corridor-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-07-21-mo-north-stl-corridor-crisis/</guid><description>&gt; Correction: An earlier draft treated a hand-selected set of districts as a demographic corridor and attributed its attendance pattern to racial composition, wealth, segregation, disinvestment, leade...</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Correction:&lt;/strong&gt; An earlier draft treated a hand-selected set of districts as a demographic corridor and attributed its attendance pattern to racial composition, wealth, segregation, disinvestment, leadership, transportation, housing and mental health without evidence that could support those claims. It also said all eight districts had at least doubled their chronic absenteeism rates and drew a continuous line through a 2020-21 district-panel discontinuity. This version defines the comparison with stable district IDs and state directory geography, limits the story to observed attendance data, corrects the longer-term count to seven of eight, and isolates the discontinuous year in the trajectory chart.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Six of the eight St. Louis-area districts with the highest chronic absenteeism rates improved between 2021-22 and 2024-25. The progress did not erase a sharp local divide: all eight still reported rates from 39.6% to 57.1% in the latest year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/riverview-gardens&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Riverview Gardens&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; had the highest rate at 57.1%, followed by &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/st-louis-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;St. Louis City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 53.7% and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/normandy-schools-collaborative&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Normandy Schools Collaborative&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 50.4%. The next five systems were &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/university-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;University City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/jennings&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jennings&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/hazelwood&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Hazelwood&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/ritenour&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Ritenour&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/ferguson-florissant&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Ferguson-Florissant&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those eight were not merely the top of a smooth ranking. Among the 23 districts assigned to St. Louis or St. Louis City counties in the state directory, Ferguson-Florissant ranked eighth at 39.6%. Pattonville ranked ninth at 27.7%, leaving an 11.9-point break between the two groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-21-mo-north-stl-corridor-crisis-comparison.png&quot; alt=&quot;Chronic absenteeism ranking across St. Louis City and County districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;One local tier, not a metro average&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comparison uses the directory&apos;s county field to define the local universe and six-digit district IDs to follow the same systems over time. All 23 IDs have a record in every year of the state&apos;s available 2008-09 through 2024-25 chronic-absence series. Complete row coverage, however, does not make every annual transition comparable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missouri&apos;s statewide chronic absenteeism rate was 17.1% in 2024-25. Even the lowest rate in the eight-district tier was more than twice that statewide figure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That comparison should not be read as a student-weighted average for the St. Louis area. The district-level attendance records used here provide rates but not the student denominators needed to combine them. Ranking the 23 district rates answers a narrower question: how the systems compare with one another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Improvement from the 2021-22 endpoint&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Six districts in the high-rate tier had lower rates in 2024-25 than in 2021-22. Ferguson-Florissant fell from 48.3% to 39.6%, an 8.7-point improvement. Riverview Gardens fell from 65.3% to 57.1%, an 8.2-point improvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Four other rates also declined: Normandy from 57.0% to 50.4%, University City from 49.4% to 46.2%, Jennings from 48.0% to 45.8% and Ritenour from 42.5% to 40.3%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;St. Louis City was unchanged at 53.7%. Hazelwood moved from 41.0% to 41.2%, a 0.2-point increase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-21-mo-north-stl-corridor-crisis-change.png&quot; alt=&quot;Change in chronic absenteeism since 2021-22&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The endpoint comparison is evidence of partial improvement, not a claim that the recovery was steady each year. It also does not make 2021-22 a universal peak. The full series is retained in the analysis so that the selected endpoints do not substitute for each district&apos;s complete path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A discontinuity around 2020-21&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A coded annual-jump screen found changes greater than 10 percentage points for 11 of the 23 local districts entering 2020-21 and seven entering 2021-22. Within the eight-district high-rate tier, seven had a change above that threshold entering 2020-21 and five did so entering 2021-22.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state aggregate did not show the same break. Its largest absolute annual change across the available series was 4.8 points. The local pattern is therefore treated as a district-panel discontinuity, not as a normal continuous transition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The records do not identify what produced the discontinuity. The comparisons used in this article avoid treating 2020-21 as a baseline: the longer view compares 2014-15 with 2024-25, while the improvement check compares 2021-22 with 2024-25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A longer gap from 2014-15&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every district in the high-rate tier remained above its own 2014-15 rate in 2024-25. Seven of the eight had at least doubled. Normandy was the exception, rising from 34.8% to 50.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-21-mo-north-stl-corridor-crisis-trajectories.png&quot; alt=&quot;Chronic absenteeism trajectories for the eight highest-rate districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state measure is the inverse of Missouri&apos;s proportional attendance rate: it captures the share of students who did not attend at least 90% of their enrolled school days. The analysis verifies that every district-year chronic-absence rate equals 100 minus the reported proportional attendance rate. That arithmetic check does not resolve the discontinuity around 2020-21.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unresourced:&lt;/strong&gt; These attendance and directory records do not identify why the eight districts form a separated high-rate tier. They cannot establish explanations involving student demographics, household income, housing, transportation, district leadership, health or other community conditions. Those questions require evidence beyond the pattern reported here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The observed result is narrower but still consequential: six systems improved after 2021-22, yet an 11.9-point break continued to separate the eighth- and ninth-ranked St. Louis-area districts in 2024-25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>