<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Kansas City - EdTribune MO - Missouri Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Kansas City. Data-driven education journalism for Missouri. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Nine Missouri Districts Where More Students Are Absent Than Present</title><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-08-11-mo-majority-absent-districts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-08-11-mo-majority-absent-districts/</guid><description>Correction, August 9, 2026: The analysis now uses one published all-students row per stable district ID for each district and year. The list and table below reflect that corrected universe.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Correction, August 9, 2026: The analysis now uses one published all-students row per stable district ID for each district and year. The list and table below reflect that corrected universe.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nine of Missouri&apos;s 560 districts had chronic absenteeism at or above 50% in 2024-25. In those districts, at least half of the students met the state&apos;s chronic-absence threshold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hogan Preparatory Academy led the list at 69.9%. KIPP: Endeavor Academy was at 60.5%, The Biome at 59.1%, Riverview Gardens at 57.1%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/st-louis-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;St. Louis City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 53.7%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/kansas-city-33&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Kansas City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 51.1%, Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled at 51.0%, Lee A. Tolbert Community Academy at 50.7%, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/normandy-schools-collaborative&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Normandy Schools Collaborative&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 50.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-08-11-mo-majority-absent-districts-bar.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts above 50% chronic absenteeism&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The latest high-rate list&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 50% line is a screening threshold, not an explanation. The attendance records show the size of the problem in each district; they do not identify one cause shared by all nine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hogan&apos;s trajectory shows how quickly a district can move across the line. Its chronic-absence rate was 14.0% in 2014-15 and 33.1% in 2019-20. It fell to 22.6% in 2020-21, then rose to 56.1% in 2021-22, 67.0% in 2022-23, and 73.4% in 2023-24 before easing to 69.9% in 2024-25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Biome followed a different path. Its rate was 100.0% at the start of the available panel, fell to 7.9% in 2018-19, and reached 59.1% in 2024-25. The series records the changes; it does not establish why they occurred.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-08-11-mo-majority-absent-districts-trajectories.png&quot; alt=&quot;Trajectories of the five highest-absence districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Riverview Gardens was already at 22.9% in 2014-15. Its rate rose to 65.3% in 2021-22 and stood at 57.1% in 2024-25, still above the screening line after the later decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where the 50% line sits&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 560 districts in the 2024-25 file fall into six rate tiers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Tier&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Number of districts&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;0-10%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;115&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;10-20%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;290&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;20-30%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;106&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;30-40%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;40-50%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;21&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;50%+&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-08-11-mo-majority-absent-districts-distribution.png&quot; alt=&quot;Distribution of districts by chronic rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The highest-rate list is not a ranking of school quality or a diagnosis of any community. It is a snapshot of published chronic-absence rates, with the latest values sitting on top of a longer and uneven record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled is one example of that variation. Its published rate ranged from 39.1% to 80.5% across the available panel and was 51.0% in 2024-25. That spread is a reason to read the current value alongside the history rather than treat the threshold as a complete explanation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>St. Louis City and Kansas City Both Remained Above 50% Chronic Absence</title><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-07-28-mo-stl-kc-both-above-50/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-07-28-mo-stl-kc-both-above-50/</guid><description>&gt; Correction: An earlier draft said 2024-25 was the first year both districts crossed 50%, omitted the 2023-24 record, called Kansas City&apos;s high-school rate the state&apos;s highest, and attached unsupport...</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Correction:&lt;/strong&gt; An earlier draft said 2024-25 was the first year both districts crossed 50%, omitted the 2023-24 record, called Kansas City&apos;s high-school rate the state&apos;s highest, and attached unsupported explanations and fiscal consequences to the attendance pattern. The complete package record shows both districts were already above 50% in 2021-22, Kansas City fell below the line the next year, and both were above it again in 2023-24 and 2024-25. This version corrects that history, limits the rankings to the complete district universe, and removes claims the attendance data cannot establish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/st-louis-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;St. Louis City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/districts/kansas-city-33&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Kansas City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; each reported chronic-absence rates above 50% for a second consecutive reporting year in 2024-25. St. Louis City&apos;s rate was 53.7%; Kansas City&apos;s was 51.1%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the state&apos;s proportional-attendance definition, that means more than half of the students in each district met the chronic-absence measure. The margin above the arithmetic halfway point was 3.7 percentage points in St. Louis City and 1.1 points in Kansas City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-28-mo-stl-kc-both-above-50-dual.png&quot; alt=&quot;Chronic absenteeism in St. Louis City and Kansas City 33&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The complete threshold history&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two districts had both been above 50% before. Each crossed the line in 2021-22: St. Louis City rose from 49.7% the prior year to 53.7%, while Kansas City moved from 37.5% to 50.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their paths then separated. St. Louis City stayed above 50% in every reporting year through 2024-25. Kansas City fell to 46.3% in 2022-23, moved to 54.9% in 2023-24 and finished at 51.1% in 2024-25. Across the full available panel, both districts were above half in three reporting years: 2021-22, 2023-24 and 2024-25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent endpoints do not describe steady movement. St. Louis City was at the same 53.7% rate in 2021-22 and 2024-25, but its intervening values produced a 3.6-point high-low range and one direction reversal. Kansas City&apos;s endpoint rose 0.7 points across those years, while its path covered an 8.6-point range and reversed direction twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;High-school rates were higher&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2024-25 grade-band records show a larger chronic-absence rate among high-school students in both districts. Kansas City reported 68.6% for high school and 43.8% for K-8, a 24.8-point gap. St. Louis City reported 63.5% for high school and 50.0% for K-8, a 13.5-point gap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-28-mo-stl-kc-both-above-50-grade-band.png&quot; alt=&quot;Grade-band chronic absenteeism&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are separately published grade-band rates, not parts of one whole. They show where each district&apos;s reported attendance problem was most concentrated without identifying why the difference exists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Fifth and sixth among 560 districts&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the complete set of 560 Missouri district records for 2024-25, St. Louis City had the fifth-highest overall chronic-absence rate and Kansas City had the sixth-highest. Nine districts were at or above 50%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mo/img/2026-07-28-mo-stl-kc-both-above-50-rankings.png&quot; alt=&quot;Missouri districts with the highest chronic-absence rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ranking uses the all-students district rate and a tie-aware ordering. It does not classify districts by governance type or attempt to label a subset as “traditional,” distinctions the attendance records do not provide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A longer endpoint comparison&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;St. Louis City&apos;s rate was 16.5% in 2014-15, 37.2 points below its 2024-25 value. Kansas City&apos;s rate was 21.9%, 29.2 points below its latest value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those endpoint differences cross a period with unusually large adjacent changes in the district records around 2020-21 and 2021-22. The analysis keeps the full history and flags those jumps rather than drawing a normal continuous trend through them. The endpoint comparison establishes that the latest rates were higher than a decade earlier; it does not establish a cause for the increase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unresourced:&lt;/strong&gt; The attendance records do not identify why either district&apos;s rate was above half. Explanations involving transportation, housing, health, district operations or family circumstances require evidence beyond these rates. The 50% line is an arithmetic majority cutoff, not a policy threshold with an automatic operational consequence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The verified finding is narrower: both urban districts remained above half for a second consecutive reporting year, and the grade-band records show that the high-school rates were higher still.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>