<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ferguson-Florissant - EdTribune MO - Missouri Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Ferguson-Florissant. Data-driven education journalism for Missouri. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Missouri Public Schools Just Hit Their Lowest Enrollment in at Least 25 Years</title><link>https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mo.edtribune.com/mo/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low/</guid><description>The number on the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education&apos;s enrollment report is one that no superintendent, school board member, or state legislator wanted to see: 855,081 students ...</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The number on the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education&apos;s enrollment report is one that no superintendent, school board member, or state legislator wanted to see: &lt;strong&gt;855,081 students&lt;/strong&gt; in the state&apos;s public schools for the 2025-26 school year. It is the lowest figure in at least a quarter century of available data, falling below even the disrupted pandemic years, and it arrives not as a surprise but as the continuation of a trend that has been quietly accelerating for two decades.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missouri peaked at 894,843 students in 2000-01. It has lost 39,762 since then — a 4.4% decline that sounds modest until you examine the pace at which the losses have mounted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/mo/img/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Missouri Public School Enrollment, 2001-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A slow leak becomes a flood&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For most of the 2000s, Missouri&apos;s enrollment barely moved. Between 2001 and 2009, the state averaged a loss of just 220 students per year — rounding error for a system serving nearly 900,000 children. Individual years bounced up and down. The trajectory was flat enough that it didn&apos;t demand attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2010s brought a steeper slide. From 2010 through 2018, annual losses averaged roughly 1,000 students per year. Still manageable. Still abstract enough to land in budget footnotes rather than headlines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then came the era that changed the math entirely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 2019, Missouri has averaged a loss of &lt;strong&gt;3,858 students every year&lt;/strong&gt; — nearly four times the pace of the prior decade. And unlike the earlier eras, when gains in one year could offset losses in the next, the recent decline has been relentless. Of the last five years, four have been negative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/mo/img/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Annual enrollment change, 2002-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The 2022 cliff&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The single worst year tells its own story. In 2021-22, Missouri lost 20,068 students in a single school year — the largest non-artifact decline in 26 years of data, and one that cut across 397 of the state&apos;s 553 districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes Missouri&apos;s experience unusual is the timing. Many states saw their enrollment crater immediately in 2020-21, when COVID closed schools and families scrambled for alternatives. Missouri&apos;s initial pandemic losses were remarkably mild: just 1,728 students between 2020 and 2021. The real collapse came a full year later, suggesting that families who stayed put during the chaos eventually made permanent decisions — homeschooling, private schools, moves out of state — once the immediate crisis passed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state clawed back 4,061 students in 2022-23, hinting at a bounce. It didn&apos;t hold. The three years since have each been negative: down 1,103, then 2,817, then 2,972. The 2022 cliff was not a one-time shock. It was a step down to a new, lower baseline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/mo/img/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low-acceleration.png&quot; alt=&quot;The decline is accelerating&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Two states in one&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide average conceals a geographic reality that is more dramatic — and more consequential — than the topline number suggests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/st-louis-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;St. Louis City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; enrolled 43,420 students in 2000-01. By 2025-26, that number has fallen to 16,211 — a loss of 27,209 students, or 62.7%. It is the single largest absolute enrollment loss of any district in the state. The district lost its full accreditation, regained it, then lost it again in January 2026. The enrollment decline and the governance crisis have fed each other for more than a decade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across the state, &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/kansas-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Kansas City 33&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has followed a remarkably similar trajectory. From 35,642 students in 2001 to 13,964 in 2026, the district has shed 60.8% of its enrollment. Together, the state&apos;s two anchor cities account for 48,887 of Missouri&apos;s 39,762-student statewide loss — meaning the rest of the state, collectively, has actually grown if you subtract the urban collapse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the losses around St. Louis extend well beyond the city limits. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/normandy-collaborative&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Normandy Schools Collaborative&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, just north of St. Louis, has lost 53.6% of its enrollment. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/riverview-gardens&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Riverview Gardens&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 31.3%. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/fergusonflorissant&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Ferguson-Florissant&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has shed 24.1%. The inner ring of suburban districts that once absorbed families fleeing the city is now losing families to the next ring out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that next ring is thriving. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/wentzville&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Wentzville&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has grown from 5,742 students to 17,538 — a 205% increase that included 20 consecutive years of growth before a brief COVID-era dip. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/north-kansas-city&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;North Kansas City 74&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reached an all-time high of 20,915. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/grain-valley&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Grain Valley&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, east of Kansas City, posted 22 consecutive years of growth before briefly dipping in 2024, climbing from 1,659 to 4,466 students over the full period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/mo/img/2026-03-31-mo-state-all-time-low-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Five districts, five trajectories&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pattern is a textbook enrollment donut. Families leave the urban core. Inner-ring suburbs absorb them for a decade, then begin declining themselves as the next generation moves further out. The growth concentrates in exurban districts with new housing stock. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/parkway&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Parkway&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 20.0%. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/hazelwood&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Hazelwood&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 14.9%. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/francis-howell&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Francis Howell&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 12.6%. &lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/rockwood&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Rockwood&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 10.4%. These are not distressed districts — they are some of the most respected school systems in the state, and they are all shrinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;173 districts at their lowest point&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline is not just an urban or suburban story. Of the 550 districts with sufficient enrollment history, 173 recorded their all-time lowest enrollment in 2025-26 — roughly one in three. Only 31 districts are at all-time highs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The districts hitting bottom span the state&apos;s geography: rural counties where birth rates have fallen for a generation, small towns that lost their manufacturing base, inner-ring suburbs caught in the donut&apos;s outward drift. The 173 figure excludes 2012-13, a year when 36 charter school districts were missing from the state&apos;s data — a gap that makes that year&apos;s numbers unreliable for comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where Missouri goes from here&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the state&apos;s five-year compound annual growth rate of -0.53%, Missouri&apos;s public schools would fall below 850,000 students by the 2027-28 school year and below 840,000 by 2030. These are not forecasts — they are projections of recent trend, and recent trend has been consistent enough to take seriously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/mo/districts/springfield&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Springfield&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, now the state&apos;s largest district at 24,004 students, has been the steadiest of Missouri&apos;s major systems — holding within a narrow band while the two anchor cities collapsed around it. But even Springfield dipped by 1,539 students in 2022 before partially recovering. No district is immune to the forces driving the decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missouri&apos;s legislature convened a &lt;a href=&quot;https://house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills241/hlrbillspdf/5798H.01I.pdf&quot;&gt;school funding formula review task force&lt;/a&gt; in 2024, charged with evaluating whether the state&apos;s per-pupil distribution model still fits the system it funds. The task force&apos;s work now unfolds against a specific backdrop: 173 districts at their smallest size in recorded history, losses accelerating rather than leveling off, and a formula that sends less money to every district that shrinks. The math is no longer abstract.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>